Plastic containers will be forbidden to be sold on public property in move toward zero-waste goal
San Francisco became the first major city Tuesday to ban the sale of plastic water bottles on public property, building on a nationwide effort to curb the billion-dollar industry.
The nine-months-in-the-making proposal by Board of Supervisors President David Chiu navigated through a number of challenging issues, from the city’s drinking water infrastructure to the impacts on events like the Folsom Street Fair or lower-key nonprofit events that often rely on the sales of the plastic water bottles for revenue.
San Francisco became the first major city Tuesday to ban the sale of plastic water bottles on public property, building on a nationwide effort to curb the billion-dollar industry.
The nine-months-in-the-making proposal by Board of Supervisors President David Chiu navigated through a number of challenging issues, from the city’s drinking water infrastructure to the impacts on events like the Folsom Street Fair or lower-key nonprofit events that often rely on the sales of the plastic water bottles for revenue.
Even as the American Beverage Association opposed the restrictions, staunch environmentalists were calling for a tougher crackdown.
During the next four years, the ban will phase out the sales of plastic water bottles 21 ounce or less on city property, indoor or outdoor, which will impact park vendors, food truck operators, street fairs and places like Moscone Center convention facility. Waivers are permissible if an adequate alternative water source is not available.
“It was not long ago that our world wasn’t addicted to plastic water bottles,” Chiu said. “It wasn’t until the 1990s that the now $60 billion plastic bottle water industry experienced an enormous growth based on massive marketing and distribution campaigns.”
The proposal was supported by the Think Outside the Bottle campaign, a nationwide effort that encourages restrictions of the “eco-unfriendly product.”
San Francisco’s ban is less strict than the full prohibitions passed in 14 national parks, a number of universities and Concord, Mass.
“This is legislation that takes a much more targeted approach to reducing plastic bottle waste,” Chiu said.
In San Francisco, Recology collects 10 million to 15 million single-use plastic water bottles a year, Chiu said.
Violators of the ban would face fines up to $1,000.
Joshua Arce, chairman of the Commission on the Environment, said the ban is “another step forward on our zero-waste goal.” The City wants to have zero waste going to its landfill by 2020. Its diversion rate now stands at 80 percent.
Past efforts toward the goal included banning plastic bags and plastic-foam containers.
“We had big public events for decades without plastic bottles and we’ll do fine without them again.”
The American Beverage Association, which includes The Coca-Cola Company and the Pepsi Cola Company, said in a statement that the ban was “nothing more than a solution in search of a problem. This is a misguided attempt by city supervisors to decrease waste in a city of avid recyclers.”
Chiu said Tuesday that future restrictions may follow.
“If we can do this on public property and folks understand that this is absolutely doable then we can look at next steps,” he said.
The Board of Supervisors voted 11-00 to approve the legislation Tuesday.
During the next four years, the ban will phase out the sales of plastic water bottles 21 ounce or less on city property, indoor or outdoor, which will impact park vendors, food truck operators, street fairs and places like Moscone Center convention facility. Waivers are permissible if an adequate alternative water source is not available.
“It was not long ago that our world wasn’t addicted to plastic water bottles,” Chiu said. “It wasn’t until the 1990s that the now $60 billion plastic bottle water industry experienced an enormous growth based on massive marketing and distribution campaigns.”
The proposal was supported by the Think Outside the Bottle campaign, a nationwide effort that encourages restrictions of the “eco-unfriendly product.”
San Francisco’s ban is less strict than the full prohibitions passed in 14 national parks, a number of universities and Concord, Mass.
“This is legislation that takes a much more targeted approach to reducing plastic bottle waste,” Chiu said.
In San Francisco, Recology collects 10 million to 15 million single-use plastic water bottles a year, Chiu said.
Violators of the ban would face fines up to $1,000.
Joshua Arce, chairman of the Commission on the Environment, said the ban is “another step forward on our zero-waste goal.” The City wants to have zero waste going to its landfill by 2020. Its diversion rate now stands at 80 percent.
Past efforts toward the goal included banning plastic bags and plastic-foam containers.
“We had big public events for decades without plastic bottles and we’ll do fine without them again.”
The American Beverage Association, which includes The Coca-Cola Company and the Pepsi Cola Company, said in a statement that the ban was “nothing more than a solution in search of a problem. This is a misguided attempt by city supervisors to decrease waste in a city of avid recyclers.”
Chiu said Tuesday that future restrictions may follow.
“If we can do this on public property and folks understand that this is absolutely doable then we can look at next steps,” he said.
The Board of Supervisors voted 11-00 to approve the legislation Tuesday.